Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

This project contains three workflows, with the distinction being made whether an item contains a software release (development workflow) or not (four step workflow).


Any work that can require a deployment uses the "Development" workflow:

These workflow steps are intended for:

  • Backlog: work has not started;
  • In progress: a developer builds & unit tests their own work to meet acceptance criteria;
  • Review: a peer reviews any code & functionality;
  • Ready for test: waiting for a QA officer;
  • In test: QA officer is performing integration test & regression test;
  • In UAT: PO/business validate that the functionality is as required, or provide feedback;
  • Done: the work is completed without deployment needed; or
  • Ready for deployment: the work is done & documented, but deployment to production is needed;
  • Scheduled for deploymen: deployment date is set;
  • Done deploymen: the solution is available and working on production.


Any issue-type that will not include a deployment uses the simplified "Four-step" workflow:


Epics have three additional statusses for Product Owners to prepare the work:

These workflow steps are intended for:

  • Epic created: work has not yet started (this specific status allows easy searching for open Epics);
  • Define business case: the goal of the epic needs to be made clear - what is the current situation, and why do we need to change this?
  • Define acceptance criteria: we can only celebrate the success of an initiative, if we make clear how we will measure success - what is the acceptance criteria?
  • Assign team: only after the business case and acceptance criteria are clear, does it make sense to involve a development team.

Field configuration

Yamaha Teams

...