...
This project contains three workflows, with the distinction being made whether an item contains a software release (development workflow) or not (four step workflow).

Any work that can require a deployment uses the "Development" workflow:

These workflow steps are intended for:
- Backlog: work has not started;
- In progress: a developer builds & unit tests their own work to meet acceptance criteria;
- Review: a peer reviews any code & functionality;
- Ready for test: waiting for a QA officer;
- In test: QA officer is performing integration test & regression test;
- In UAT: PO/business validate that the functionality is as required, or provide feedback;
- Done: the work is completed without deployment needed; or
- Ready for deployment: the work is done & documented, but deployment to production is needed;
- Scheduled for deploymen: deployment date is set;
- Done deploymen: the solution is available and working on production.
Any issue-type that will not include a deployment uses the simplified "Four-step" workflow:

Epics have three additional statusses for Product Owners to prepare the work:

These workflow steps are intended for:
- Epic created: work has not yet started (this specific status allows easy searching for open Epics);
- Define business case: the goal of the epic needs to be made clear - what is the current situation, and why do we need to change this?
- Define acceptance criteria: we can only celebrate the success of an initiative, if we make clear how we will measure success - what is the acceptance criteria?
- Assign team: only after the business case and acceptance criteria are clear, does it make sense to involve a development team.
Field configuration
Yamaha Teams
...